Lawyers for Donald Trump went before a Manhattan appeals court on Thursday to ask that his May 2024 hush-money conviction be thrown out, according to early reports from several outlets. The appeal challenges the jury verdict that found Trump guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree.
The stakes are plain. If the appeal succeeds, the conviction could be wiped away. If it fails, the verdict remains in place and the defense would have to look elsewhere for relief.
A word of caution for readers: the details below come from initial news coverage, not from a court transcript or the filings themselves, which we have not yet reviewed. Some particulars, including the exact arguments made at the lectern, remain unconfirmed.
What the Jury Decided in 2024
The case centered on reimbursement payments to Michael Cohen. Each of the 34 counts corresponded to one of those payments. Prosecutors say the payments hid a $130,000 hush-money payment to Stormy Daniels.
The jury returned its verdict in May 2024, convicting Trump on all 34 counts. The appeal now asks a higher court to set that verdict aside.
The Immunity Argument
According to MS NOW, which covered the hearing on its legal blog, Trump's personal lawyer Robert Giuffra argued the appeal in court.
CBS News reported that the defense contends the Supreme Court's 2024 presidential-immunity decision, along with the federal and New York constitutions and other precedent, requires that the case be dismissed. CBS's coverage also points to a defense claim that the Cohen reimbursements related to Trump's official work as president. The precise shape of that argument, and how the judges received it, could not be confirmed from the reporting available so far.
A Claim of Political Pressure
The defense also challenges the motives behind the prosecution. NBC Washington reported that the first paragraph of the defense's argument alleges "immense political pressure" on a Democratic prosecutor. The snippet we have does not say which prosecutor or office the defense means, and we have not seen the filing itself.
The hearing drew wide coverage, including from CBS, ABC, Bloomberg, NBC Washington, Spectrum News and wire-style copy carried by U.S. News. The reports we have seen are short summaries, and none of them substitutes for the court record.
What We Still Don't Know
Several questions remain open. It is not yet clear how the appellate judges responded to either side, how long the arguments ran, or what prosecutors argued in defense of the verdict. An earlier item from Yahoo and CBS indicated that Trump's lawyers filed their written appeal brief on a Monday, but that date has not been confirmed.
What Comes Next
No decision has been reported. The court has not announced when it will rule, and the full filings and a hearing transcript will show more about what each side argued. Until then, the question of whether the Supreme Court's immunity decision bears on this Manhattan conviction remains unanswered.
Bake Pizza Anywhere: The Ember Portable Oven by InstaFire
America's Power Grid Is on Borrowed Time. This Solar Generator Comes With EMP Protection
Try Ready Hour Emergency Food for $34.99 With This 72-Hour Sample Pack
The Fire Starter That Lights on Snow, Damp Ground, Even Standing Water
This Tactical Flashlight Also Breaks Car Glass and Cuts Seatbelts
Stuck on the Road This Winter? This Car Kit Packs Food, Water and 47 Emergency Items
0 Comments
Be the first to comment.